Serwis opracowany przez:zjednoczenie.com: dynamiczne strony internetowe, portale i zaawansowane serwisy www system cms - system zarządzania treścią, publikacja w internecie, website management, content management system
english   kontakt   mapa serwisu
Polskie Forum Corporate Governance
  STRONA GŁÓWNA | WYDARZENIA | WARTO PRZECZYTAĆ | POLSKA | EUROPA | OPINIE PFCG | DLA SPONSORÓW | NOWOŚCI

 pfcg.org.pl 


Poznaj corporate governance
z właściwej strony


 

 

szukaj:

Evolution, not revolution! Corporate Governance Rating 2005
źródło: PFCG
[01/09/2006]

The third edition of the corporate governance rating by the Polish Forum for Corporate Governance, elaborated in cooperation with the daily Rzeczpospolita, shows that the level of corporate governance solutions in public companies becomes higher. This translates into promotion of particular companies up to higher rating categories and into lower investment risk in respect of corporate governance. In this year’s edition of the rating, the highest category A consisted of three companies, namely Bank BPH, Bank Zachodni WBK, and Agora.

Załączniki

Ownership and Financing Structures of Listed and Large Non-listed Corporations (PDF) otwórz plikwyślij plik e-mailem

Ownership and Financing Structures of Listed and Large Non-listed Corporations

[21/07/2006]
źródło: The World Bank
autor: Claessens S., Tzioumis K.

Abstract

In this paper, we use a large data set of more than 10,000 firms for 19 European countries in order to compare the ownership and financing structures, and performance of listed (LCs) and large non-listed companies (NLCs). For the overall sample, we find that the vast majority NLCs have either a large or medium blockholder. This contrasts the ownership structure of LCs, which usually have no blockholder with over 50 percent stake. Moreover, we present information on typology of ultimate blockholders as well as financial ratios in LCs and NLCs. The results from matched-pairs analysis, employed in order to directly compare the two categories, suggest that NLCs’ financing structures are more geared towards debt and of shorter term. Although NLCs use relatively less fixed assets, they appear more capital intensive than LC. In terms of performance, NLCs have higher returns on assets and equity than LCs do, but lower margins, with these differences to remain when conducting multivariate regressions. Overall, the results suggest that, while ownership structures and corporate governance mechanisms differ between NLCs and LCs, these differences do not affect their performance materially.

  zjednoczenie.com